The Simpson Trial: What The Crime Scene REALLY Told Us

The prosecution in the simpson murder trial thought their case was a slam dunk, with strong forensic evidence tying simpson to the killings. The murder trial of o. j. Simpson both polarized and gripped a nation, leaving an impact that reverberates 30 years after it began on. The defense alleged that the drop of blood on the back gate at the bundy crime scene, which matched simpson, and the blood found on a pair of socks in simpson's bedroom, which. Simpsons didnt convince him.

Some black people welcomed the verdict, while many white people were in disbelief. Prosecutors had a mountain of evidence including blood at multiple crime scenes, a missing alibi, a bloody shoe print and the now infamous bloody gloves. Simpson murder trial cast a harsh light on police and forensic work, and gave law enforcement a textbook example of what not to do at a crime scene. With their witnesses and scientific evidence, prosecutors thought they had proved that o. j. Simpson was at the crime scene and had the motive, strength and opportunity to kill. Los angeles the o. j. Simpson murder trial cast a harsh light on police and forensic work, and gave law enforcement a textbook example of what not to do at a crime scene.